Assessment of inter-operator variability in peripheral monocyte subset gating strategy using flow cytometry in patients with suspected acute stroke.

BACKGROUND: Innovative tools to reliably identify patients with acute stroke are needed. Peripheral monocyte subsets, that is, classical-Mon1, intermediate-Mon2, and non-classical-Mon3, with their activation marker expression analyzed using flow-cytometry (FCM) could be interesting cell biomarker candidates. AIM: To assess the inter-operator variability in a new peripheral monocyte subset gating strategy using FCM in patients with suspected acute stroke. METHODS: In BOOST-study ("Biomarkers-algOrithm-for-strOke-diagnoSis-and Treatment-resistance-prediction," NCT04726839), patients ≥18 years with symptoms suggesting acute stroke within the last 24 h were included. Blood was collected upon admission to emergency unit. FCM analysis was performed using the FACS-CANTO-II® flow-cytometer and Flow-Jo™-software. Analyzed markers were CD45/CD91/CD14/CD16 (monocyte backbone) and CD62L/CD11b/HLA-DR/CD86/CCR2/ICAM-1/CX3CR1/TF (activation markers). Inter-operator agreement (starting from raw-data files) was quantified by the measure distribution and, for each patient, the coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: Three operators analyzed 20 patient blood samples. Median inter-operator CVs were below the pre-specified tolerance limits (10% [for Mon1 counts], 20% [Mon2, Mon3 counts], 15% [activation marker median-fluorescence-intensities]). We observed a slight, but systematic, inter-operator effect. Overall, absolute inter-operator differences in fractions of monocyte subsets were <0.03. CONCLUSION: Our gating strategy allowed monocyte subset gating with an acceptable inter-operator variability. Although low, the inter-operator effect should be considered in monocyte data analysis of BOOST-patients.

Plasma lysosphingolipids in GRN-related diseases: Monitoring lysosomal dysfunction to track disease progression.

GRN mutations are among the main genetic causes of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Considering the progranulin involvement in lysosomal homeostasis, we aimed to evaluate if plasma lysosphingolipids (lysoSPL) are increased in GRN mutation carriers, and whether they might represent relevant fluid-based biomarkers in GRN-related diseases. We analyzed four lysoSPL levels in plasmas of 131 GRN carriers and 142 non-carriers, including healthy controls and patients with frontotemporal dementias (FTD) carrying a C9orf72 expansion or without any mutation. GRN carriers consisted of 102 heterozygous FTD patients (FTD-GRN), three homozygous patients with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-11 (CLN-11) and 26 presymptomatic carriers (PS-GRN), the latter with longitudinal assessments. Glucosylsphingosin d18:1 (LGL1), lysosphingomyelins d18:1 and isoform 509 (LSM18:1, LSM509) and lysoglobotriaosylceramide (LGB3) were measured by electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry coupled to ultraperformance liquid chromatography. Levels of LGL1, LSM18:1 and LSM509 were increased in GRN carriers compared to non-carriers (p < 0.0001). No lysoSPL increases were detected in FTD patients without GRN mutations. LGL1 and LSM18:1 progressively increased with age at sampling, and LGL1 with disease duration, in FTD-GRN. Among PS-GRN carriers, LSM18:1 and LGL1 significantly increased over 3.4-year follow-up. LGL1 levels were associated with increasing neurofilaments in presymptomatic carriers. This study evidences an age-dependent increase of ß-glucocerebrosidase and acid sphingomyelinase substrates in GRN patients, with progressive changes as early as the presymptomatic phase. Among FTD patients, plasma lysoSPL appear to be uniquely elevated in GRN carriers, and thus might serve as suitable non-invasive disease-tracking biomarkers of progression, specific to the pathophysiological process. Finally, this study might add lysoSPL to the portfolio of fluid-based biomarkers, and pave the way to disease-modifying approaches based on lysosomal function rescue in GRN diseases.